- Home
- About
- General Issues
- Maps
-
Position Statements
- 2011 >
-
2012
>
- Time to Negotiate the Northern and Southern Sectors of the Israeli-West Bank Border
- President Peres and Dr. Ashrawi: Thank You for Staying on Track
- Playing the Victim Card Will Not Bring Peace
- Negotiations By the Parties
- The World Should Help the Palestinian Hunger Striker
- ...and only afterwards move to discuss the topic of Jerusalem
- A Question of Accountability
- Israel Twisting in the Wind
- Netanyahu: Too Big for His Britches
- Netanyahu's "Israeli Comfort"
- How Shaul Mofaz Can Jump-Start the Peace Process
- Netanyahu on the Brink
- Time for Taking Stock
- Israel in Wonderland
- Whatever Happened to the Quartet?
- The Palestinians Want to Negotiate
- A Time for Hope and a Call for Restraint
- Israel Can Win in Gaza, But Not Now
- Congratulations to the New State of Palestine!
- Security and Borders: Both Required for Peace
-
2013
>
- It Is Up to Israel to Restart Peace Negotiations
- Israel and Palestine: Changing the Terms of Agreement
- The Knesset Bill to Increase the Number of Women that Elect the Chief Rabbis Is Important for Jewish Women
- Proposal on Governance of the Holy Basin
- Time for Netanyahu to Reach Across the Aisle
- Tzipi Livni's Challenge
- Women Should Be Free to Pray at the Wailing Wall
- Proposed Highway through the Jordan Valley Will Backfire on Israel
- 2014 >
-
2015
>
- We Should Applaud Herzog and Livni for Reclaiming Zionism
- The Next Israeli Government
- West Bank Citizenry and Receipt of Individuals of Palestinian Origin
- What Next for Israel?
- Palestinian statehood
- Mischief in the Trade Legislation would Hinder Progress
- What Next for America?
- Could American Firms Choose to Gradually Disinvest from Israel?
- Boycotting Israel is not anti-Semitism
- 2016 >
- 2017 >
- 2019 >
- Resources
- About the Authors
Benny Gantz Can Do Better than Pander to the Settlers
July 14, 2019
We cannot let pass without comment Blue and White candidate Benny Gantz’s statement on Thursday July 11, reported in Hamodia and Arutz Sheva, that Jewish settlers living in the West Bank would be able to remain in their settlements under any agreement with the Palestinians.
He was signaling agreement with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s promise to the settlers the previous day. Gantz largely made this statement for political reasons, hoping to pull in Likud voters to Blue and White in the September elections on grounds that Netanyahu has criminal indictments hanging over him.
Nevertheless, this kind of short-term thinking can hardly be constructive to any sort of viable peace process. Prudence requires reconsideration, both now and later should Gantz become the next Prime Minister.
There is some evidence that Gantz can do better. On April 7 of this year, he condemned Netanyahu’s electioneering pledge to unilaterally annex the West Bank and said he opposed “unilateral” moves. “We said we will strive for a regionally and globally backed peace agreement while maintaining our basic principles.” Those principles included keeping some large settlement blocs in the West Bank, but not every settlement.
Any negotiated peace agreement will require compromises. Neither side will be able to get all they want—neither the Palestinians with their demand for an unrestricted Right of Return nor the Israelis to maintain all their settlements in the West Bank. The conflict has dragged on too long for lack of leaders willing to make hard choices and sell these choices to their people.
The Palestinian leadership was unwilling to accept a peace deal with Israel during the brief opportunities when such deals could be made—when Ehud Barak offered terms to Yasser Arafat at Camp David, or when Ehud Olmert offered terms to Mahmoud Abbas—because they had not prepared the Palestinian people to accept anything less than all their demands. Consequently, the political price of a treaty with Israel was too high. Netanyahu as well has made the settlers such a big part of his base it would be political suicide to ask them to relinquish their settlements. Do we have to watch Gantz dig himself into the same hole?
The Citizens Proposal makes clear in its maps what sort of territorial solution can support goals for peace and provide the Palestinians with a viable and accepted state that can exist peacefully alongside Israel. It will certainly require dismantling some settlements, especially isolated ones. With too many intrusive settlements, Palestinians cannot have a contiguous state with sovereignty over its own affairs. Hence, once a peace agreement with agreed-upon borders is signed, Israeli settlers who live on the Palestinian side of the border will either have to leave their homes or accept the position of a minority within the State of Palestine. For those who choose the latter out of attachment to the land, we would want the Palestinian State to accord them equal rights as citizens.
We are looking for the next Israeli prime minister to lead the nation into peace with the Palestinians and acceptance among the world community. For this, Israel’s next leader needs to have a long-range vision for what that peace will look like for Israel and Palestine. If that peace requires Israelis to sacrifice a few settlements, he or she should begin preparing the public for that inevitable day. Pandering to the settlers supporting Likud by claiming that no settlement will be closed down is short-range thinking that may win a mandate or two, but in the long run will only make peace more difficult, and life more intolerable in varying degrees for individuals, communities and nations.
We hope the next leader of Israel will be an inspirational figure who will motivate Israelis to take steps for peace. He or she should set out a new direction for the country that breaks from the narrow nationalism of the Netanyahu crowd and returns to the founding idealism of the state.
Jews in America and worldwide also are looking for such a leader. They want to be proud of Israel for its democratic values, justice, support of diversity and compassion for minorities, and as a shining light of peace for the world community. Many of them see that Israel has strayed far from that original vision, to its detriment. It is also to the detriment of world Jewry, which sometimes has to bear with fallout from Israel’s actions.
We cannot let pass without comment Blue and White candidate Benny Gantz’s statement on Thursday July 11, reported in Hamodia and Arutz Sheva, that Jewish settlers living in the West Bank would be able to remain in their settlements under any agreement with the Palestinians.
He was signaling agreement with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s promise to the settlers the previous day. Gantz largely made this statement for political reasons, hoping to pull in Likud voters to Blue and White in the September elections on grounds that Netanyahu has criminal indictments hanging over him.
Nevertheless, this kind of short-term thinking can hardly be constructive to any sort of viable peace process. Prudence requires reconsideration, both now and later should Gantz become the next Prime Minister.
There is some evidence that Gantz can do better. On April 7 of this year, he condemned Netanyahu’s electioneering pledge to unilaterally annex the West Bank and said he opposed “unilateral” moves. “We said we will strive for a regionally and globally backed peace agreement while maintaining our basic principles.” Those principles included keeping some large settlement blocs in the West Bank, but not every settlement.
Any negotiated peace agreement will require compromises. Neither side will be able to get all they want—neither the Palestinians with their demand for an unrestricted Right of Return nor the Israelis to maintain all their settlements in the West Bank. The conflict has dragged on too long for lack of leaders willing to make hard choices and sell these choices to their people.
The Palestinian leadership was unwilling to accept a peace deal with Israel during the brief opportunities when such deals could be made—when Ehud Barak offered terms to Yasser Arafat at Camp David, or when Ehud Olmert offered terms to Mahmoud Abbas—because they had not prepared the Palestinian people to accept anything less than all their demands. Consequently, the political price of a treaty with Israel was too high. Netanyahu as well has made the settlers such a big part of his base it would be political suicide to ask them to relinquish their settlements. Do we have to watch Gantz dig himself into the same hole?
The Citizens Proposal makes clear in its maps what sort of territorial solution can support goals for peace and provide the Palestinians with a viable and accepted state that can exist peacefully alongside Israel. It will certainly require dismantling some settlements, especially isolated ones. With too many intrusive settlements, Palestinians cannot have a contiguous state with sovereignty over its own affairs. Hence, once a peace agreement with agreed-upon borders is signed, Israeli settlers who live on the Palestinian side of the border will either have to leave their homes or accept the position of a minority within the State of Palestine. For those who choose the latter out of attachment to the land, we would want the Palestinian State to accord them equal rights as citizens.
We are looking for the next Israeli prime minister to lead the nation into peace with the Palestinians and acceptance among the world community. For this, Israel’s next leader needs to have a long-range vision for what that peace will look like for Israel and Palestine. If that peace requires Israelis to sacrifice a few settlements, he or she should begin preparing the public for that inevitable day. Pandering to the settlers supporting Likud by claiming that no settlement will be closed down is short-range thinking that may win a mandate or two, but in the long run will only make peace more difficult, and life more intolerable in varying degrees for individuals, communities and nations.
We hope the next leader of Israel will be an inspirational figure who will motivate Israelis to take steps for peace. He or she should set out a new direction for the country that breaks from the narrow nationalism of the Netanyahu crowd and returns to the founding idealism of the state.
Jews in America and worldwide also are looking for such a leader. They want to be proud of Israel for its democratic values, justice, support of diversity and compassion for minorities, and as a shining light of peace for the world community. Many of them see that Israel has strayed far from that original vision, to its detriment. It is also to the detriment of world Jewry, which sometimes has to bear with fallout from Israel’s actions.
Gantz reportedly said that he would deal with the Palestinian issue later. Suppose there were a Jewish issue in France; Jews wouldn’t want President Macron to say, “I have to deal with more pressing matters; I will get to the Jews later.” No people with grievances, and the Palestinians have their share, want to be relegated to the end of the queue.
The least Gantz could do is pledge to put together a commission to study the matter and seek solutions; that way without revealing his hand during the election season he would still show Israel and the world that he intends for peace to be an important matter for his administration.
In the current international environment, Gantz, by categorically declaring the he will preserve every settlement, is aligning himself with powerful reactionary forces that resist peace, both regionally and internationally.
On one side, the United States under President Trump has a policy towards Israel dominated by the Christian Right and its religious attachment to biblical claims. On the other side, he stokes the impotent rage felt by many Arabs in the nations surrounding Israel, which could increase instability and radicalism in the region. Both these forces will push Israel to maintain the highly militaristic and defensive stance of the current government. The result will be only continuing stalemate.
The time has come for change of leadership in Israel, and in Palestinian circles as well. We need new leaders who are not afraid to articulate a long-range vision for peace. This is a necessary first step to prepare their respective peoples to step outside of their comfortable nationalisms, go beyond their fears, and seek a genuine peace agreement that can be accepted by both sides.
We hope that Benny Gantz and the Blue and White party will give Israel the necessary vision and courage to step up for peace. Gantz can do better than pander to the settlers.
The least Gantz could do is pledge to put together a commission to study the matter and seek solutions; that way without revealing his hand during the election season he would still show Israel and the world that he intends for peace to be an important matter for his administration.
In the current international environment, Gantz, by categorically declaring the he will preserve every settlement, is aligning himself with powerful reactionary forces that resist peace, both regionally and internationally.
On one side, the United States under President Trump has a policy towards Israel dominated by the Christian Right and its religious attachment to biblical claims. On the other side, he stokes the impotent rage felt by many Arabs in the nations surrounding Israel, which could increase instability and radicalism in the region. Both these forces will push Israel to maintain the highly militaristic and defensive stance of the current government. The result will be only continuing stalemate.
The time has come for change of leadership in Israel, and in Palestinian circles as well. We need new leaders who are not afraid to articulate a long-range vision for peace. This is a necessary first step to prepare their respective peoples to step outside of their comfortable nationalisms, go beyond their fears, and seek a genuine peace agreement that can be accepted by both sides.
We hope that Benny Gantz and the Blue and White party will give Israel the necessary vision and courage to step up for peace. Gantz can do better than pander to the settlers.
