- Home
- About
- General Issues
- Maps
-
Position Statements
- 2011 >
-
2012
>
- Time to Negotiate the Northern and Southern Sectors of the Israeli-West Bank Border
- President Peres and Dr. Ashrawi: Thank You for Staying on Track
- Playing the Victim Card Will Not Bring Peace
- Negotiations By the Parties
- The World Should Help the Palestinian Hunger Striker
- ...and only afterwards move to discuss the topic of Jerusalem
- A Question of Accountability
- Israel Twisting in the Wind
- Netanyahu: Too Big for His Britches
- Netanyahu's "Israeli Comfort"
- How Shaul Mofaz Can Jump-Start the Peace Process
- Netanyahu on the Brink
- Time for Taking Stock
- Israel in Wonderland
- Whatever Happened to the Quartet?
- The Palestinians Want to Negotiate
- A Time for Hope and a Call for Restraint
- Israel Can Win in Gaza, But Not Now
- Congratulations to the New State of Palestine!
- Security and Borders: Both Required for Peace
-
2013
>
- It Is Up to Israel to Restart Peace Negotiations
- Israel and Palestine: Changing the Terms of Agreement
- The Knesset Bill to Increase the Number of Women that Elect the Chief Rabbis Is Important for Jewish Women
- Proposal on Governance of the Holy Basin
- Time for Netanyahu to Reach Across the Aisle
- Tzipi Livni's Challenge
- Women Should Be Free to Pray at the Wailing Wall
- Proposed Highway through the Jordan Valley Will Backfire on Israel
- 2014 >
-
2015
>
- We Should Applaud Herzog and Livni for Reclaiming Zionism
- The Next Israeli Government
- West Bank Citizenry and Receipt of Individuals of Palestinian Origin
- What Next for Israel?
- Palestinian statehood
- Mischief in the Trade Legislation would Hinder Progress
- What Next for America?
- Could American Firms Choose to Gradually Disinvest from Israel?
- Boycotting Israel is not anti-Semitism
- 2016 >
- 2017 >
- 2019 >
- 2020 >
- 2023 >
- 2024
- Resources
- About the Authors
Right of Return
Once a proposed border is adopted, issues of security and the right of return can be addressed. We do not see a continued exclusion of Palestinians who wish to return to the State of Israel as fundamentally problematic, as long as a quantified number of returnees can be agreed upon by both parties. Our basic starting point for what Israel should offer Palestine for right of return is a minimum of 100,000 people. We believe that this number of returning Palestinians would not negate, change or dilute the character of the State of Israel as it is. The addition of 100,000 Palestinians amounts to only 1.3 percent of Israel’s population (currently 7,473,000).
We offer the suggestion that the State of Israel could develop eight new communities for returnees to initially lodge in. We expect Israel to consult her Arab citizens for locale, and to listen strongly to the voice of local Arabs to determine if they agree on a reasonable quantity of returnees for their locality.
We seek to remove “the sting” of the issue of right of return, but we do not in any way seek to imply that we have fully comprehended the heart, suffering or manifold issues that come with people who would like to return to what commonly has been referred to as the Holy Land.
We offer the suggestion that the State of Israel could develop eight new communities for returnees to initially lodge in. We expect Israel to consult her Arab citizens for locale, and to listen strongly to the voice of local Arabs to determine if they agree on a reasonable quantity of returnees for their locality.
We seek to remove “the sting” of the issue of right of return, but we do not in any way seek to imply that we have fully comprehended the heart, suffering or manifold issues that come with people who would like to return to what commonly has been referred to as the Holy Land.