- Home
- About
- General Issues
- Maps
-
Position Statements
- 2011 >
-
2012
>
- Time to Negotiate the Northern and Southern Sectors of the Israeli-West Bank Border
- President Peres and Dr. Ashrawi: Thank You for Staying on Track
- Playing the Victim Card Will Not Bring Peace
- Negotiations By the Parties
- The World Should Help the Palestinian Hunger Striker
- ...and only afterwards move to discuss the topic of Jerusalem
- A Question of Accountability
- Israel Twisting in the Wind
- Netanyahu: Too Big for His Britches
- Netanyahu's "Israeli Comfort"
- How Shaul Mofaz Can Jump-Start the Peace Process
- Netanyahu on the Brink
- Time for Taking Stock
- Israel in Wonderland
- Whatever Happened to the Quartet?
- The Palestinians Want to Negotiate
- A Time for Hope and a Call for Restraint
- Israel Can Win in Gaza, But Not Now
- Congratulations to the New State of Palestine!
- Security and Borders: Both Required for Peace
-
2013
>
- It Is Up to Israel to Restart Peace Negotiations
- Israel and Palestine: Changing the Terms of Agreement
- The Knesset Bill to Increase the Number of Women that Elect the Chief Rabbis Is Important for Jewish Women
- Proposal on Governance of the Holy Basin
- Time for Netanyahu to Reach Across the Aisle
- Tzipi Livni's Challenge
- Women Should Be Free to Pray at the Wailing Wall
- Proposed Highway through the Jordan Valley Will Backfire on Israel
- 2014 >
-
2015
>
- We Should Applaud Herzog and Livni for Reclaiming Zionism
- The Next Israeli Government
- West Bank Citizenry and Receipt of Individuals of Palestinian Origin
- What Next for Israel?
- Palestinian statehood
- Mischief in the Trade Legislation would Hinder Progress
- What Next for America?
- Could American Firms Choose to Gradually Disinvest from Israel?
- Boycotting Israel is not anti-Semitism
- 2016 >
- 2017 >
- 2019 >
- 2020 >
- 2023 >
- 2024
- Resources
- About the Authors
About the Citizens Proposal
The Citizens Proposal for a Border between Israel and Palestine is the result of efforts to envision a border that would respect equally the rights of both Israelis and Palestinians. We also see the value of this border in providing a context for modifying some of the incongruous relationships, built over many decades, between Jews and Arabs. We see the opportunity to tap into the beauty that is both the people of Palestine and the people of Israel in a way that could generate tremendous dividends.
This website lays out one specific proposal for a border. We invite both Palestinians and Israelis to examine this proposal and to consider whether they would be satisfied that said border could represent them—in what they would wish for themselves and what they would be willing to give to the other side—or at least serve as a good basis for negotiation.
We would have hoped that at this juncture, Israelis and Palestinians would be making every effort to negotiate a border. Yet in the absence of such negotiations, we citizens of the world community are certainly within our rights to offer in front of Almighty God another way forward. In no way do we believe that this is the only way forward. However, we believe this is a reasonable way forward, one which can offer ground-breaking possibilities for men, women and children all over the Middle East.
Our conviction comes from our love of God rather than from any innocence or naiveté. Because many citizens of the Middle East are religious, we ourselves have made an effort to be prayerful in arriving at a two-state solution, and not only that, but a solution taking into consideration the political realities, precedents of the past, and hopes for the future.
We support the international efforts and investment of the United States, the European Union, and other nations as true and well-placed. We do not believe, however, that these efforts have well mapped out all the issues. Here is where we seek to make a contribution. Let the reader take upon him- or herself the obligation to seriously consider whether this proposal would be helpful.
This website lays out one specific proposal for a border. We invite both Palestinians and Israelis to examine this proposal and to consider whether they would be satisfied that said border could represent them—in what they would wish for themselves and what they would be willing to give to the other side—or at least serve as a good basis for negotiation.
We would have hoped that at this juncture, Israelis and Palestinians would be making every effort to negotiate a border. Yet in the absence of such negotiations, we citizens of the world community are certainly within our rights to offer in front of Almighty God another way forward. In no way do we believe that this is the only way forward. However, we believe this is a reasonable way forward, one which can offer ground-breaking possibilities for men, women and children all over the Middle East.
Our conviction comes from our love of God rather than from any innocence or naiveté. Because many citizens of the Middle East are religious, we ourselves have made an effort to be prayerful in arriving at a two-state solution, and not only that, but a solution taking into consideration the political realities, precedents of the past, and hopes for the future.
We support the international efforts and investment of the United States, the European Union, and other nations as true and well-placed. We do not believe, however, that these efforts have well mapped out all the issues. Here is where we seek to make a contribution. Let the reader take upon him- or herself the obligation to seriously consider whether this proposal would be helpful.
The Authors
First published August 2011
Revised January 14, 2012
First published August 2011
Revised January 14, 2012
