- Home
- About
- General Issues
- Maps
-
Position Statements
- 2011 >
-
2012
>
- Time to Negotiate the Northern and Southern Sectors of the Israeli-West Bank Border
- President Peres and Dr. Ashrawi: Thank You for Staying on Track
- Playing the Victim Card Will Not Bring Peace
- Negotiations By the Parties
- The World Should Help the Palestinian Hunger Striker
- ...and only afterwards move to discuss the topic of Jerusalem
- A Question of Accountability
- Israel Twisting in the Wind
- Netanyahu: Too Big for His Britches
- Netanyahu's "Israeli Comfort"
- How Shaul Mofaz Can Jump-Start the Peace Process
- Netanyahu on the Brink
- Time for Taking Stock
- Israel in Wonderland
- Whatever Happened to the Quartet?
- The Palestinians Want to Negotiate
- A Time for Hope and a Call for Restraint
- Israel Can Win in Gaza, But Not Now
- Congratulations to the New State of Palestine!
- Security and Borders: Both Required for Peace
-
2013
>
- It Is Up to Israel to Restart Peace Negotiations
- Israel and Palestine: Changing the Terms of Agreement
- The Knesset Bill to Increase the Number of Women that Elect the Chief Rabbis Is Important for Jewish Women
- Proposal on Governance of the Holy Basin
- Time for Netanyahu to Reach Across the Aisle
- Tzipi Livni's Challenge
- Women Should Be Free to Pray at the Wailing Wall
- Proposed Highway through the Jordan Valley Will Backfire on Israel
- 2014 >
-
2015
>
- We Should Applaud Herzog and Livni for Reclaiming Zionism
- The Next Israeli Government
- West Bank Citizenry and Receipt of Individuals of Palestinian Origin
- What Next for Israel?
- Palestinian statehood
- Mischief in the Trade Legislation would Hinder Progress
- What Next for America?
- Could American Firms Choose to Gradually Disinvest from Israel?
- Boycotting Israel is not anti-Semitism
- 2016 >
- 2017 >
- Resources
- About the Authors
Thus Endeth the Jewish State
Alison Wakelin
January 23, 2017
Plagued from the beginning by the religious Zionist absolute unquestioning assumption that the land currently occupied by both Arabs and Jews was directly given to the Jewish people by God, Israel has always had to struggle with the duality at the core of its identity, dividing the population into many different factions. The religious, maybe messianic, zeal which determines that almost anything is acceptable in the taking of the land has finally brought us to the point where the very next step takes the region maybe beyond the possibility of the two-state solution. Israel now must decide between democratic values, which would demand equal protection of the rights of all residents, and the apparent the convergence of religious values and politics that seems to be driving the new U.S. administration.
Imagine how devastating it must be to Arabs in Palestine that they don’t even get to vote about such decisive steps! Their fate is being decided by leaders of nations who seem too often to know or care nothing of their daily reality and their recent history. U.S. President Donald Trump and British Prime Minister Theresa May seem more concerned with settling issues between Palestine and Israel according to their own benefit at home, leaving Palestinians as simply chess pieces to be used and moved around the board as they deem best.
Although Prime Minister May has offered some assurances that Britain still believes Israeli settlements in Palestinian lands are illegal, to distance the UK from Europe and the previous US administration for her own purposes is a dangerous and disrespectful course on which to embark. It disrespects all those Britons who actually care deeply about the Palestinian people, and are aware of Britain’s very checkered past in taking on the role of overseer. Let us hope that seeing the jubilant reaction in the far right corridors of power has been enough to convince Mrs. May that she needs a more considered approach.
And President Trump? Initial thoughts that emerged from his own mouth in early days of his presidential campaign seemed to indicate that he was ready to bring his purportedly powerful experience in making deals to the arena of Israeli/Palestinian relations. Yet, Trump’s statement that he intends to move the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem has led Israel to believe that he will totally support its extreme right wing agenda. The president should stick to his strengths; he is not the elected representative of either Israelis or Palestinians, and simply caving in to the opinions of people motivated by religious conviction will not help any quest to do well by the world.
The people of Israel have other concerns to address, maybe most prominently that of their own identity. Who are they? Who do they want to be in 30 years or so?
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has required, as one of his major conditions for a deal, that the Palestinians recognize Israel as a Jewish state. Is this a religious identity? The most religious people in Israel would be the ultra-Orthodox, in the sense that they consider themselves to be the only ones following the laws of the covenant made thousands of years ago with their God. But they have actually deeply compromised their own status, since as a result of them joining the governing coalition in order to gain power, their own children are moving towards a more secular form of Judaism.
Religious exemption from the Israel Defense Forces has been a point of strong contention with the rest of Israel, as well as support of the spiritual lifestyle which requires young men to study Torah instead of acquiring a more secular education and entering gainful employment. But in choosing to rely on Netanyahu’s benevolence rather than on the power of their God in supporting these goals, the ultra-Orthodox find themselves compromised. Their own children see them bowing to secular power, and thus themselves are choosing in unprecedented numbers to join the IDF and abandon the spiritual path.
The perspective of religious Zionists and revisionist Jews has allowed for the violence that was an integral part of the founding of Israel to continue today. Palestinians have suffered under this religious zeal, and we are led now to ask, What is the plan for the six million or so Arabs who will be living within the boundaries of a Jewish state? Naftali Bennett, for example, seems to expect them somehow to evaporate and disappear.
Israel has almost become simply another secular country relying on military power more than on spiritual power, and thus one is left asking the question, What is a Jewish state? In accepting the values and the support of outside powers rather than tackling the actual issue of making peace themselves, Israel has essentially eradicated its own agenda of establishing a Jewish state.
At this point, the only way to turn this around may be for the parties in the governing coalition to truly sit down and enter a phase of deep soul-searching as to who they are and where they want to go. Most are happily embarking on the final stages of adopting a path which will leave the Palestinians homeless and stateless, occupied by a foreign body. Everyone should know that this cannot last as a stable reality, with the prospect of morphing into a single state in 30 years or so, with almost equal Jewish and Arab populations. In the meantime, life in the Middle East will be filled with hostility and conflict. Netanyahu seems so focused on today’s reality and on holding on to power that he doesn’t care. Do all the parties in the ruling coalition feel the same way?
Annexation of the settlement of Ma’ale Adumim, a determining step in extending Israeli sovereignty over the West Bank, would appear to be the end of realistic opportunity for the two-state solution to retain viability. Opposing this annexation seems to be the only path that can assure Israel’s existence as a Jewish state—as something other than just another secular democratic state.
January 23, 2017
Plagued from the beginning by the religious Zionist absolute unquestioning assumption that the land currently occupied by both Arabs and Jews was directly given to the Jewish people by God, Israel has always had to struggle with the duality at the core of its identity, dividing the population into many different factions. The religious, maybe messianic, zeal which determines that almost anything is acceptable in the taking of the land has finally brought us to the point where the very next step takes the region maybe beyond the possibility of the two-state solution. Israel now must decide between democratic values, which would demand equal protection of the rights of all residents, and the apparent the convergence of religious values and politics that seems to be driving the new U.S. administration.
Imagine how devastating it must be to Arabs in Palestine that they don’t even get to vote about such decisive steps! Their fate is being decided by leaders of nations who seem too often to know or care nothing of their daily reality and their recent history. U.S. President Donald Trump and British Prime Minister Theresa May seem more concerned with settling issues between Palestine and Israel according to their own benefit at home, leaving Palestinians as simply chess pieces to be used and moved around the board as they deem best.
Although Prime Minister May has offered some assurances that Britain still believes Israeli settlements in Palestinian lands are illegal, to distance the UK from Europe and the previous US administration for her own purposes is a dangerous and disrespectful course on which to embark. It disrespects all those Britons who actually care deeply about the Palestinian people, and are aware of Britain’s very checkered past in taking on the role of overseer. Let us hope that seeing the jubilant reaction in the far right corridors of power has been enough to convince Mrs. May that she needs a more considered approach.
And President Trump? Initial thoughts that emerged from his own mouth in early days of his presidential campaign seemed to indicate that he was ready to bring his purportedly powerful experience in making deals to the arena of Israeli/Palestinian relations. Yet, Trump’s statement that he intends to move the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem has led Israel to believe that he will totally support its extreme right wing agenda. The president should stick to his strengths; he is not the elected representative of either Israelis or Palestinians, and simply caving in to the opinions of people motivated by religious conviction will not help any quest to do well by the world.
The people of Israel have other concerns to address, maybe most prominently that of their own identity. Who are they? Who do they want to be in 30 years or so?
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has required, as one of his major conditions for a deal, that the Palestinians recognize Israel as a Jewish state. Is this a religious identity? The most religious people in Israel would be the ultra-Orthodox, in the sense that they consider themselves to be the only ones following the laws of the covenant made thousands of years ago with their God. But they have actually deeply compromised their own status, since as a result of them joining the governing coalition in order to gain power, their own children are moving towards a more secular form of Judaism.
Religious exemption from the Israel Defense Forces has been a point of strong contention with the rest of Israel, as well as support of the spiritual lifestyle which requires young men to study Torah instead of acquiring a more secular education and entering gainful employment. But in choosing to rely on Netanyahu’s benevolence rather than on the power of their God in supporting these goals, the ultra-Orthodox find themselves compromised. Their own children see them bowing to secular power, and thus themselves are choosing in unprecedented numbers to join the IDF and abandon the spiritual path.
The perspective of religious Zionists and revisionist Jews has allowed for the violence that was an integral part of the founding of Israel to continue today. Palestinians have suffered under this religious zeal, and we are led now to ask, What is the plan for the six million or so Arabs who will be living within the boundaries of a Jewish state? Naftali Bennett, for example, seems to expect them somehow to evaporate and disappear.
Israel has almost become simply another secular country relying on military power more than on spiritual power, and thus one is left asking the question, What is a Jewish state? In accepting the values and the support of outside powers rather than tackling the actual issue of making peace themselves, Israel has essentially eradicated its own agenda of establishing a Jewish state.
At this point, the only way to turn this around may be for the parties in the governing coalition to truly sit down and enter a phase of deep soul-searching as to who they are and where they want to go. Most are happily embarking on the final stages of adopting a path which will leave the Palestinians homeless and stateless, occupied by a foreign body. Everyone should know that this cannot last as a stable reality, with the prospect of morphing into a single state in 30 years or so, with almost equal Jewish and Arab populations. In the meantime, life in the Middle East will be filled with hostility and conflict. Netanyahu seems so focused on today’s reality and on holding on to power that he doesn’t care. Do all the parties in the ruling coalition feel the same way?
Annexation of the settlement of Ma’ale Adumim, a determining step in extending Israeli sovereignty over the West Bank, would appear to be the end of realistic opportunity for the two-state solution to retain viability. Opposing this annexation seems to be the only path that can assure Israel’s existence as a Jewish state—as something other than just another secular democratic state.